UX Design & Webflow Agency NYC | Composite Global
All Posts

Viva Las Vegas

Share

Greg Cipolaro

May 1, 2026

PDF
Download the full letter to print or read anytime
Download
PDF
Download the full letter to print or read anytime
Download

IN TODAY'S ISSUE:

  • We outline key takeaways from Bitcoin 2026 in Las Vegas, where focus areas concentrated on digital credit, lending markets, AI, and quantum computing.
  • Conference sentiment moderated year-over-year, but meeting quality and engagement levels remained high.
  • Institutional development continued without slowdown despite softer sentiment, reinforcing that capital formation and product buildout remain active across cycles.

Viva Las Vegas

We’re back from the Bitcoin 2026 conference in Vegas, the largest gathering of its kind. Although we’re poorly rested, we wanted to relay our high-level thoughts about the event, including key takeaways from our participation on panels, observations from the broader events, and key focus items from our meetings and conversations with institutions in the ecosystem.

Cyclical Reset Is Driving Sentiment

Let’s get this out of the way first – the vibe was subdued this year, especially in comparison to 2025. As a reminder, at this time in 2025, the current administration was newly in power, regulatory changes were underway, the strategic bitcoin reserve had just been created, ETFs were humming along, DATs had just appeared on the scene in a big way, and bitcoin was on its way to an all-time high. By contrast, this year much of the administration’s promises have been or are on the verge of being accomplished, price has undergone a precipitous drop from the all-time high but has rebounded and now stabilized, volatility is down, a conflict with Iran is underway with no discernible time frame, and twin techno fears of AI and quantum computing are on every investor's lips. But even though sentiment was down, participants were not out.

Institutional Build Continues Beneath the Surface

Despite weaker sentiment, the quality of meetings with financial institutions, corporates, and investors was as high as ever. Bitcoin is shifting from a predominantly portfolio allocation decision toward a core component of financial infrastructure, as evidenced by increasing integration across custody, trading, and credit markets. This shift is evident in bitcoin’s growing use as collateral for margin, secured lending, and structured products, indicating a transition toward financialization rather than purely directional speculation.

Credit and Lending Are Emerging as Core Growth Vectors

One of the biggest themes was the evolution of digital asset credit markets, where activities are moving beyond simple overcollateralized loans toward hybrid instruments such as preferred equity offerings, including STRC from Strategy (MSTR) and SATA from Strive (ASST), products designed to meet investor yield targets driven by bitcoin returns. The products remain niche in the broader credit landscape, with just 2 products, but they have already unlocked billions of dollars of demand for bitcoin.

Spreads Between CeFi and DeFi Borrowing Narrowing

The Kelp DAO hack and Aave losses that caused a spike in stablecoin borrow rates were fresh on the minds of many participants. The ripple effects are still being felt with higher borrowing costs for those accessing DeFi as a source of capital. There was a growing acknowledgement that perhaps DeFi broadly hadn’t priced in risk appropriately, and that borrow rates were too low. On the other side, CeFi, borrow rates have been systematically coming down as financial institutions are becoming increasingly comfortable with bitcoin as collateral. This is all pointing to a narrowing of the spread between the cost of capital provided by DeFi and CeFi.  

AI Infused in Nearly Every Conversation

AI dominated the flow of conversations across the conference, extending beyond formal presentations into informal exchanges where participants shared practical use cases alongside perspectives on business and macro impact. On the infrastructure side, the transition from bitcoin mining to AI continues unabated, as operators reallocate power and data center capacity toward higher-value workloads with greater utilization visibility and more durable demand profiles.

Quantum Computing Threat Still Looms

There were numerous panels, including one we participated in, regarding the impact that quantum computing will have on bitcoin and cryptography more broadly. There are still those in the camp that CRQCs (cryptographically relevant quantum computers) that can crack digital signatures are still the purview of science fiction, but for the broader majority, this remains an existential risk. The good thing is that the technical community is not asleep at the switch, and numerous options for a post-quantum world were discussed. Still, solutions are likely to be contentious, but investors should take solace from the fact that this isn’t the first time the community has been confronted with big technical and social problems.

Twenty One Acquisitions Highlight a Bifurcation in DAT Strategies

Tether’s proposed combination of Twenty One Capital (XXI), payments platform Strike, and mining operator Elektron Energy highlights a growing bifurcation in digital asset treasury strategies, as platforms increasingly choose between integrating operating businesses or pursuing capital markets-driven “digital credit” models. While embedding operating assets was central to Twenty One’s strategy at launch just over a year ago, this transaction represents the first meaningful step toward executing that approach.

Across the landscape, vehicles such as Nakamoto are leaning into acquisitions to anchor crypto exposure with recurring operating cash flows, while Strategy and Strive are prioritizing the “digital credit” playbook through instruments like STRC and SATA to scale balance sheets.

A Clear Tension: Decentralization vs Institutionalization

A notable undercurrent was the growing tension between early Bitcoin adopters and institutional participants, driven by concerns that rising ownership of bitcoin from ETFs, DATs, and corporates is introducing centralization dynamics with custodians. This tension is a function of scale, as a ~$2T asset class requires participation from large pools of capital, which inherently operate within regulated and centralized frameworks. Bitcoin itself has not changed, but its investor base has shifted toward large entities, creating a perception gap between the asset’s original ethos and its current ownership structure.

Bitcoin Integration within Traditional Payments

Payments emerged as a central theme, with Block (Cash App) maintaining a prominent presence on the exhibition floor and emphasizing features such as pay-with-bitcoin, bitcoin-denominated rewards, a newly introduced hardware wallet, and NFC-based tap-to-pay integration through Square. The breadth of product integration signals a shift from standalone crypto functionality toward embedding bitcoin within existing payment functionality.

This positioning reflects a broader convergence between digital assets and traditional payments infrastructure, as bitcoin increasingly functions as a native layer within consumer and merchant transaction flows rather than an adjacent or experimental feature set.

Market Update

Bitcoin declined 1.8% over the past week after failing to sustain a breakout above the $80K level, with price action transitioning into a consolidation range following the rejection. The inability to clear $80K reflects near-term supply at higher levels, while trading activity softened during the Bitcoin conference window, consistent with prior years where liquidity and market focus temporarily decline, before stabilizing into the latter part of the week.

Relative performance lagged equities, with the S&P 500 up 1.4% and the Nasdaq up 1.9% over the same period, indicating incremental capital rotated toward traditional risk assets.

Macro developments introduced incremental policy uncertainty, as the Senate Banking Committee advanced Kevin Warsh’s nomination for Fed Chair while Jay Powell confirmed he will remain on the Board as a governor after his Chair term ends in May 2026. This decision represents a break from modern precedent, during which departing Chairs have exited the Board entirely, with the last comparable instance occurring in 1948. Powell is staying on as a Fed governor, citing unprecedented legal attacks on the Fed's independence and unresolved questions around the $2.5B HQ renovation review, with his departure date undefined

Finally, the coordinated DeFi backstop for Kelp DAO has reached 50,450 ETH in confirmed commitments, with total pledges rising to 137,615 ETH, including pending votes, compared to 116,500 rsETH stolen in the exploit. The scale of pledged capital now exceeds the loss on a gross basis, contingent on governance approvals, signaling strong industry alignment to contain systemic spillover.

Market pricing has responded accordingly, with the rsETH/ETH ratio recovering to 1.05 from a post-exploit low of 0.87, versus 1.07 pre-incident, indicating a meaningful restoration of confidence as recapitalization efforts gained visibility. The remaining ~2% discount to pre-hack levels implies residual risk tied to the execution of pending votes and final loss socialization outcomes.

Important News This Week

Investing:

Paul Tudor Jones Interview Calling Bitcoin "The Best Inflation Hedge" - X

Institutional Demand to Drive Bitcoin Market Cap to $16 trillion by 2030: Ark Invest - CoinDesk

Regulation and Taxation:

SEC, CFTC Chiefs Signal ‘New Day’ for U.S. Onshore Crypto, Tokenization and Future‑Proof Rules - Bitcoin Magazine

Celsius Founder Alex Mashinsky Banned From Crypto Industry in $10 Million FTC Settlement - Decrypt

Companies:

Tether Investments Proposes Merger Plans at Twenty-One Capital to Accelerate its Strategic Direction - Tether

Tether Posts $1.04 Billion Q1 Profit, Reaches $8.23 Billion Reserve Buffer - CoinDesk

MARA Holdings to Buy Long Ridge Energy in $1.5 Billion AI Data Center Push - CoinDesk

Trump Family Crypto Project Quietly Sold as Holders Got Stuck - Bloomberg

Upcoming Events

May 5 - Consensus Conference
May 12
- CPI release
May 29
- CME expiry

Start Reading
Start Reading

IN TODAY'S ISSUE:

  • We outline key takeaways from Bitcoin 2026 in Las Vegas, where focus areas concentrated on digital credit, lending markets, AI, and quantum computing.
  • Conference sentiment moderated year-over-year, but meeting quality and engagement levels remained high.
  • Institutional development continued without slowdown despite softer sentiment, reinforcing that capital formation and product buildout remain active across cycles.

Viva Las Vegas

We’re back from the Bitcoin 2026 conference in Vegas, the largest gathering of its kind. Although we’re poorly rested, we wanted to relay our high-level thoughts about the event, including key takeaways from our participation on panels, observations from the broader events, and key focus items from our meetings and conversations with institutions in the ecosystem.

Cyclical Reset Is Driving Sentiment

Let’s get this out of the way first – the vibe was subdued this year, especially in comparison to 2025. As a reminder, at this time in 2025, the current administration was newly in power, regulatory changes were underway, the strategic bitcoin reserve had just been created, ETFs were humming along, DATs had just appeared on the scene in a big way, and bitcoin was on its way to an all-time high. By contrast, this year much of the administration’s promises have been or are on the verge of being accomplished, price has undergone a precipitous drop from the all-time high but has rebounded and now stabilized, volatility is down, a conflict with Iran is underway with no discernible time frame, and twin techno fears of AI and quantum computing are on every investor's lips. But even though sentiment was down, participants were not out.

Institutional Build Continues Beneath the Surface

Despite weaker sentiment, the quality of meetings with financial institutions, corporates, and investors was as high as ever. Bitcoin is shifting from a predominantly portfolio allocation decision toward a core component of financial infrastructure, as evidenced by increasing integration across custody, trading, and credit markets. This shift is evident in bitcoin’s growing use as collateral for margin, secured lending, and structured products, indicating a transition toward financialization rather than purely directional speculation.

Credit and Lending Are Emerging as Core Growth Vectors

One of the biggest themes was the evolution of digital asset credit markets, where activities are moving beyond simple overcollateralized loans toward hybrid instruments such as preferred equity offerings, including STRC from Strategy (MSTR) and SATA from Strive (ASST), products designed to meet investor yield targets driven by bitcoin returns. The products remain niche in the broader credit landscape, with just 2 products, but they have already unlocked billions of dollars of demand for bitcoin.

Spreads Between CeFi and DeFi Borrowing Narrowing

The Kelp DAO hack and Aave losses that caused a spike in stablecoin borrow rates were fresh on the minds of many participants. The ripple effects are still being felt with higher borrowing costs for those accessing DeFi as a source of capital. There was a growing acknowledgement that perhaps DeFi broadly hadn’t priced in risk appropriately, and that borrow rates were too low. On the other side, CeFi, borrow rates have been systematically coming down as financial institutions are becoming increasingly comfortable with bitcoin as collateral. This is all pointing to a narrowing of the spread between the cost of capital provided by DeFi and CeFi.  

AI Infused in Nearly Every Conversation

AI dominated the flow of conversations across the conference, extending beyond formal presentations into informal exchanges where participants shared practical use cases alongside perspectives on business and macro impact. On the infrastructure side, the transition from bitcoin mining to AI continues unabated, as operators reallocate power and data center capacity toward higher-value workloads with greater utilization visibility and more durable demand profiles.

Quantum Computing Threat Still Looms

There were numerous panels, including one we participated in, regarding the impact that quantum computing will have on bitcoin and cryptography more broadly. There are still those in the camp that CRQCs (cryptographically relevant quantum computers) that can crack digital signatures are still the purview of science fiction, but for the broader majority, this remains an existential risk. The good thing is that the technical community is not asleep at the switch, and numerous options for a post-quantum world were discussed. Still, solutions are likely to be contentious, but investors should take solace from the fact that this isn’t the first time the community has been confronted with big technical and social problems.

Twenty One Acquisitions Highlight a Bifurcation in DAT Strategies

Tether’s proposed combination of Twenty One Capital (XXI), payments platform Strike, and mining operator Elektron Energy highlights a growing bifurcation in digital asset treasury strategies, as platforms increasingly choose between integrating operating businesses or pursuing capital markets-driven “digital credit” models. While embedding operating assets was central to Twenty One’s strategy at launch just over a year ago, this transaction represents the first meaningful step toward executing that approach.

Across the landscape, vehicles such as Nakamoto are leaning into acquisitions to anchor crypto exposure with recurring operating cash flows, while Strategy and Strive are prioritizing the “digital credit” playbook through instruments like STRC and SATA to scale balance sheets.

A Clear Tension: Decentralization vs Institutionalization

A notable undercurrent was the growing tension between early Bitcoin adopters and institutional participants, driven by concerns that rising ownership of bitcoin from ETFs, DATs, and corporates is introducing centralization dynamics with custodians. This tension is a function of scale, as a ~$2T asset class requires participation from large pools of capital, which inherently operate within regulated and centralized frameworks. Bitcoin itself has not changed, but its investor base has shifted toward large entities, creating a perception gap between the asset’s original ethos and its current ownership structure.

Bitcoin Integration within Traditional Payments

Payments emerged as a central theme, with Block (Cash App) maintaining a prominent presence on the exhibition floor and emphasizing features such as pay-with-bitcoin, bitcoin-denominated rewards, a newly introduced hardware wallet, and NFC-based tap-to-pay integration through Square. The breadth of product integration signals a shift from standalone crypto functionality toward embedding bitcoin within existing payment functionality.

This positioning reflects a broader convergence between digital assets and traditional payments infrastructure, as bitcoin increasingly functions as a native layer within consumer and merchant transaction flows rather than an adjacent or experimental feature set.

Market Update

Bitcoin declined 1.8% over the past week after failing to sustain a breakout above the $80K level, with price action transitioning into a consolidation range following the rejection. The inability to clear $80K reflects near-term supply at higher levels, while trading activity softened during the Bitcoin conference window, consistent with prior years where liquidity and market focus temporarily decline, before stabilizing into the latter part of the week.

Relative performance lagged equities, with the S&P 500 up 1.4% and the Nasdaq up 1.9% over the same period, indicating incremental capital rotated toward traditional risk assets.

Macro developments introduced incremental policy uncertainty, as the Senate Banking Committee advanced Kevin Warsh’s nomination for Fed Chair while Jay Powell confirmed he will remain on the Board as a governor after his Chair term ends in May 2026. This decision represents a break from modern precedent, during which departing Chairs have exited the Board entirely, with the last comparable instance occurring in 1948. Powell is staying on as a Fed governor, citing unprecedented legal attacks on the Fed's independence and unresolved questions around the $2.5B HQ renovation review, with his departure date undefined

Finally, the coordinated DeFi backstop for Kelp DAO has reached 50,450 ETH in confirmed commitments, with total pledges rising to 137,615 ETH, including pending votes, compared to 116,500 rsETH stolen in the exploit. The scale of pledged capital now exceeds the loss on a gross basis, contingent on governance approvals, signaling strong industry alignment to contain systemic spillover.

Market pricing has responded accordingly, with the rsETH/ETH ratio recovering to 1.05 from a post-exploit low of 0.87, versus 1.07 pre-incident, indicating a meaningful restoration of confidence as recapitalization efforts gained visibility. The remaining ~2% discount to pre-hack levels implies residual risk tied to the execution of pending votes and final loss socialization outcomes.

Important News This Week

Investing:

Paul Tudor Jones Interview Calling Bitcoin "The Best Inflation Hedge" - X

Institutional Demand to Drive Bitcoin Market Cap to $16 trillion by 2030: Ark Invest - CoinDesk

Regulation and Taxation:

SEC, CFTC Chiefs Signal ‘New Day’ for U.S. Onshore Crypto, Tokenization and Future‑Proof Rules - Bitcoin Magazine

Celsius Founder Alex Mashinsky Banned From Crypto Industry in $10 Million FTC Settlement - Decrypt

Companies:

Tether Investments Proposes Merger Plans at Twenty-One Capital to Accelerate its Strategic Direction - Tether

Tether Posts $1.04 Billion Q1 Profit, Reaches $8.23 Billion Reserve Buffer - CoinDesk

MARA Holdings to Buy Long Ridge Energy in $1.5 Billion AI Data Center Push - CoinDesk

Trump Family Crypto Project Quietly Sold as Holders Got Stuck - Bloomberg

Upcoming Events

May 5 - Consensus Conference
May 12
- CPI release
May 29
- CME expiry

Start Reading
Start Reading

This report has been prepared solely for informational purposes and does not represent investment advice or provide an opinion regarding the fairness of any transaction to any and all parties nor does it constitute an offer, solicitation or a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security or instrument or to adopt any investment strategy. Charts and graphs provided herein are for illustrative purposes only. This report does not represent valuation judgments with respect to any financial instrument, issuer, security or sector that may be described or referenced herein and does not represent a formal or official view of New York Digital Investment Group or its affiliates (collectively NYDIG).It should not be assumed that NYDIG will make investment recommendations in the future that are consistent with the views expressed herein, or use any or all of the techniques or methods of analysis described herein. NYDIG may have positions (long or short) or engage in securities transactions that are not consistent with the information and views expressed in this report. The information provided herein is valid only for the purpose stated herein and as of the date hereof (or such other date as may be indicated herein) and no undertaking has been made to update the information, which may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. The information in this report may contain forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. NYDIG neither assumes any duty to nor undertakes to update any forward-looking statements. There is no assurance that any forward-looking events or targets will be achieved, and actual outcomes may be significantly different from those shown herein. The information in this report, including statements concerning financial market trends, is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Information furnished by others, upon which all or portions of this report are based, are from sources believed to be reliable. However, NYDIG makes no representation as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information and has accepted the information without further verification. No warranty is given as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information. No responsibility is taken for changes in market conditions or laws or regulations and no obligation is assumed to revise this report to reflect changes, events or conditions that occur subsequent to the date hereof. Nothing contained herein constitutes investment, legal, tax or other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Legal advice can only be provided by legal counsel. NYDIG shall have no liability to any third party in respect of this report or any actions taken or decisions made as a consequence of the information set forth herein. By accessing this report, the recipient acknowledges its understanding and acceptance of the foregoing terms.

newsletter

Sign up for weekly research

Subscribe now to learn what’s driving bitcoin markets, track significant regulatory developments, and get the data that deserves your attention.

Featured Research & Insights

Viva Las Vegas

Viva Las Vegas

Viva Las Vegas
Research
May 1, 2026
Read Now
When DeFi Isn't Decentralized: Lessons from the Aave Bank Run

When DeFi Isn't Decentralized: Lessons from the Aave Bank Run

When DeFi Isn't Decentralized: Lessons from the Aave Bank Run
Video
April 29, 2026
The Butterfly Effect Comes to DeFi

The Butterfly Effect Comes to DeFi

The Butterfly Effect Comes to DeFi
Research
April 24, 2026
Read Now
Let's Connect

Want to learn more about NYDIG?

Please complete the contact form, and we will help you find the right person to learn more.